Can anyone suggest an alternative to USDA organic certification? - usda organic, teething gel
If Yahoo: Feature this problem is very important.
All kinds of surveys show that organic foods are healthier for people and better for the environment. No one can refute it scientifically.
If more people is an important value of organic products see is more than food, more people would be willing to spend a little more about organic food.
But while many manufacturers and retailers believe in the goodness of organic products, I will not go through the certification, which can be very expensive.
People: this is what we mean by "fraud" ... Benefits of organic food are authentic. But I think the farmers, it is unfair to charge ridiculous amounts of fees to "USDA certified organic." They believe that they have to do something for the people and the world.
Labeling a product "organic" does not always cut. People trust "certificates".
What do you recommend for more affordable organic certificatione?
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Usda Organic, Teething Gel Can Anyone Suggest An Alternative To USDA Organic Certification?
4 comments:
With more and more scientific evidence coming in about the gains organic food - both for the environment and the consumption of people - I think with the polluter pays principle would be a viable option to reduce the organic food certification.
Responsible For example, organic farmers are, and have good agricultural practices through the use of compost (increased instead of following raw manure), the holding capacity of soil water to meet the threat of flooding. The soil also tends to more CO2 that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere to fix.
Through the payment of conventional farmers consequences of unsustainable practices of their culture is just, the price may be compensated for organic certification. Alternatively, organic farmers can receive credits from the area that are directly linked to their sustainable practices, offset the costs of certification.
If your question is the production of organic food is more affordable, then you have the need for certification in the first into question. Yes Nois in front of a transparent system, which means that you - or someone you know you trust - such as the manufacturer, the food tastes good, the producer Stewardship win prizes for the environment, there is much interaction between the producers and the society and so on., then what is required for certification?
I'm glad to know it is organic good for the environment - from organic to include transgenic crops and farming more land for the same performance as the normal growth of plants. While pesticide use less fertilizer is probably a good thing, it is not used, is a big of them.
There is so little difference between organic and regular tests are expensive and there is ample evidence that the additional cost of the organic matter that is really known to maintain health. It is likely that food grown right on the spot, if available, is preferable, because less deterioration in the transport of organically grown remote.
Of course, what the farmers want to neglect organic - instead of the exact number of days or percent of ground chicken feed, and applies to all chickens, they would prefer it if most of the hens have a couple of days and that was organic - that is, checking for procrastination is costly.
Go to this site:
http://www.naturallygrown.org/
I am one of the small farmers who do not want to have to go through the certification and more money into the pockets of governments.
I raise goats and rabbits for meat from the meat. We build our own food for animals, without using chemicals or pesticides of any kind on our farm.
The research of many cultural taboos of my clients. Since the mineral / Blade Protien my goats. Almost all of their licks springs chicken protein or fat. My two clients are taboo for Muslims. So do not feed my goats so lame, because I respect my customers.
It is very difficult for small farmers. If my sales Tens of thousands of dollars per year must be approved by the government, if I legally use the term "organic" want. My solution is simply the word "bio-delete" one of my farm bulletins, brochures, or what I say.
"By nature" or "as nature intended" to grow Bred two sentences that bio replacing the use of the term.
Whatever youpeople have tried to break into law, sparing to some extent, or simply dishonest. I do not think a second term will bennificial. I do not see an appropriate way to make the process more affordable organic certification for small farmers.
Shopping in the agricultural markets is a good way to get organic food to the farmers who are not or not yet in the bio-CERT. Farmers should always be prepared to discuss their practices and to openly and honestly as he managed his farm and crops. If not, choose someone else to buy. Note: If a farmer thinks you're an environmentalist, you're still probably clam up real fast.
It is also known as small farmers like me who go through the process .... refuse to be even if it was free. Just because I do not think that it is for governments to be footprints on our farms and in our information in large databases.
In fact, because the demand for titanium for biological products, rules and regulations loosend the whole time, becauseInsert / business lobbies mega Agra. Organics are no longer produced by the mother of Nice and farmers hippie pop. They are produced in large mega-farms and in a way which is quiet similar to non-organic. Note how the spots begin to disappear into organic foods?
If you really want, organic, small farmers find and buy. Help of their family, their methods and their commitment to the production of healthy food. We are here .... difficult to find. Furthermore, we expect a fair price for what we pay to produce. It is more expensive for us to produce really high quality food (often heritage breeds and species), the generic rubbish that is unpleasant in supermarkets.
Garnet ~
Homesteading / Farming over 20 years
Post a Comment